A union consultant for Customs and Border Patrol officers defended a proposed coverage that might enable the Department of Homeland Security to gather DNA samples from individuals held at immigration detention amenities.
Speaking to Fox & Friends host Griff Jenkins on Saturday morning, Brandon Judd, president of the Border Patrol Union, characterised the brand new coverage—and President Donald Trump—as “all about the rule of law.”
“When we collect the DNA, we know that there’s a lot of people that come and go into the United States. And there are thousands of crimes that are committed that are unsolved on a regular—on a yearly basis. DNA will help us solve those crimes because there’s always residue from DNA that are left at every single crime scene,” Judd claimed.
By Judd’s reasoning, those that flout the regulation by coming into or remaining within the United States unlawfully are prone to behave criminally throughout their keep, an concept prevalent amongst those that wish to scale back immigration to the United States—regardless of knowledge displaying that immigrants of every type are a lot much less prone to commit crimes than native-born Americans.
On Wednesday, the Department of Justice introduced that it’s engaged on new rules that might acquire DNA knowledge from the 40,000 individuals at present in federal immigration detention to be included within the FBI’s felony DNA database. The new regulation will successfully sidestep a 2005 immigration detainee exemption that Congress instated in DNA assortment insurance policies to guard immigrants, in response to The New York Times.
The American Civil Liberties Union was fast to denounce the brand new Justice Department coverage. In an announcement issued Wednesday, ACLU employees lawyer Vera Eidelman wrote, “This kind of mass collection alters the purpose of DNA collection from one of criminal investigation to population surveillance, which is contrary to our basic notions of freedom and autonomy.” Eidelman additionally identified that, “This means the administration’s racist immigration policies will also implicate the rights of family members in other countries and family members here, including American citizens.”
Judd addressed the ACLU’s claims on the finish of his interview saying, “In 22 years in law enforcement, I have never seen a situation in which DNA has caused unwarranted profiling. In fact that’s where the ACLU is going to fail in this court challenge. They will be filing a court challenge, of course. What they’re going to fail is they’re not going to be able to show a judge cause—reasonable likelihood that DNA will in fact be used to used to profile persons. It just, it’s not reality.”
The ACLU didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark from Newsweek.