Proposed Security Law Marks the End of Hong Kong and a Warning to the World, Human Rights Watch says


China’s plans for a brand new safety regulation that will ban treason, sedition and secession in Hong Kong marks the tip for the semi-autonomous area and sends a chilling warning to the remainder of the world, members of the Human Rights Watch (HRW) stated on Thursday.

The controversial measure—titled “Establishing and Improving the Legal System and Enforcement Mechanism of Hong Kong”—was proposed throughout the preparatory assembly for the third session of the 13th National People’s Congress (NPC) and shall be debated when the session commences on Friday. The regulation was launched by way of a scarcely used constitutional route that successfully bypasses Hong Kong’s lawmakers, and seeks to crack down on escalating anti-Beijing and pro-democracy protesters.

Speaking to Newsweek from Hong Kong on Friday morning native time, HRW Senior Researcher Maya Wang stated that the regulation will “end Hong Kong as we know it.”

Given China’s previous behaviors, we may be sure that “this decision will fundamentally change the ways of Hong Kong,” she advised Newsweek. “These restrictions on so many different fundamental freedoms and values would alter our way of life. It would impact, for example, media freedom, the free press, the ability of civil society to exist.”

HRW China Director Sophie Richardson stated the transfer “manifestly marks the end of any pretense that the central government in Beijing is going to respect norms, practices or binding international treaties in Hong Kong.”

“What’s really been damaged today is the idea that you can walk out on the street to protest and say what you want with the expectation that will be tolerated by China,” Richardson advised Newsweek, noting that protesters will now need to watch out to not behave in a means that might be construed as a menace to nationwide safety.

Proposed Security Law Marks the End of Hong Kong and a Warning to the World, Human Rights Watch says
Police stand off with protesters throughout a protest on the International Finance Center shopping center on April 28, 2020 in Hong Kong, China. Anthony Kwan/Getty

When Hong Kong was returned to China by the British in 1997, Beijing touted an association known as “One Country, Two Systems,” beneath which the territory can be allowed to retain a excessive diploma of autonomy and self-governance. The mainland promised the area common suffrage, however twenty years later, though its pseudo-democratic system permits residents to vote, the record of candidates continues to be accredited by China.

As set out within the Sino-British Joint Declaration, “One Country, Two Systems” is ready to run out in 2047. But based on Richardson, Beijing’s plan signifies that they are keen to soak up Hong Kong sooner than was promised. “We’re closer to 2047 than we were 2 days ago,” she stated.

Prominent pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong echoed HRW’s sentiments. “If this move takes place, ‘One Country, Two Systems’ will be officially erased. This is the end of Hong Kong,” Civic Party lawmaker Dennis Kwok stated following the announcement.

The Chinese Communist Party views such legal guidelines as mandatory to guard Beijing’s sovereignty from exterior our bodies searching for to undermine it. Hong Kong’s authorities proposed related laws in 2003 that will have allowed authorities to execute searches with the absence of warrants and finish troublemaking newspaper publications. The rule was ultimately ditched following widespread protests.

A Chinese state-run newspaper editorial argued that the measure will act as a deterrent and can maintain “those who challenge national security” accountable for his or her habits.

Richardson on Thursday warned that Beijing’s new proposal sends an alarming message to the remainder of the world: “Regardless of what you think our legal commitments or mutual agreements to you are, to us, it means what we think it means, and we will interpret it as we see fit.”

“Any country who has a binding agreement with the Chinese government” ought to now not depend on it, she warned.

Wang defined that “losing Hong Kong will also mean losing the powerful voice that provides a slight moral check on China” which is necessary as a result of Beijing is “expanding its influence and becoming increasingly powerful.”

“Human rights abuses will no longer stay in the mainland,” she added.

The scenario appears to be like grim for Hong Kong, however Richardson believes the area’s younger protesters will not seemingly take China’s newest energy seize mendacity down and can rapidly arrange to protest—the very exercise the mainland’s measure is searching for to quash.

The U.S. State Department threw their assist behind Hong Kong on Thursday and warned China in opposition to imposing the brand new laws.

In an 2018 interview with Newsweek, Nobel Peace Prize nominee Joshua Wong, billed because the mastermind of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement in 2014, vowed to proceed preventing for Hong Kong democracy “until it finally becomes a reality.”

“In 10 years’ time I will be on the same battlefield,” Wong stated. “I just hope when people think of Hong Kong, it’s not just all Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan or dim sum. I hope in the near future, they will think of our country as a place where people fight for democracy.”