‘Irresistible’ movie review: What critics say about Jon Stewart’s new film


What has Jon Stewart been as much as since leaving “The Daily Show”?

It’s been 5 years since Stewart signed off from the Comedy Central program as a way to pursue different inventive tasks, and to this point, he hasn’t had a number of luck with these ventures. “The Nightly Show With Larry Wilmore,” which Stewart created for his longtime “Daily Show” correspondent Wilmore, was canceled after two seasons. An HBO animated collection meant to parody cable information was canceled earlier than it ever aired. Now, Stewart’s political satire “Irresistible,” starring former “Daily Show” correspondent and Acton native Steve Carell, has been compelled to overlook its theatrical run because of the coronavirus pandemic, heading on to video on-demand providers.

The plot of “Irresistible” facilities round Democrat political strategist Gary Zimmer (Carell), who heads to a small Wisconsin city to seek out retired Marine colonel Jack Hastings (Kingston resident Chris Cooper, “Little Women”) and persuade him to run for workplace after Hastings is seen on video standing up for immigrants at a city assembly. As Hastings begins to construct momentum in an important swing state, a Republican political strategist (Rose Byrne, “Bridesmaids”) exhibits as much as sow discord.

Reviews have been usually unfavourable, with the movie incomes a 40 percent freshness rating on Rotten Tomatoes on the time of this text’s publication. That mentioned, a single quantity can’t adequately seize the vary of essential response, and lots of the critiques coded as “fresh” or “rotten” by the essential aggregation website have a bit extra nuance. To make it easier to decide whether or not to shell out $19.99 to lease the movie, right here’s what a number of the high movie critics are saying, each good and unhealthy, about “Irresistible.”

The Good

Peter Travers, of Rolling Stone, praised “Irresistible” for not taking sides politically, and credited the three principal forged members for his or her performances.

Carell and Byrne are dynamite as these dueling political assassins, who insist that any lie turns into fact in the event you say it “repeatedly, doggedly, and with unearned confidence.” The closest Irresistible involves a Capra-esque hero is the Colonel, and the reliably very good Cooper performs him near the vest and with seemingly incorruptible integrity.


David Rooney, of the Hollywood Reporter, puzzled whether or not audiences would need a political satire proper now, however credited the movie as each humorous and refusing to take ideological sides and for skewering the media.

Taken by itself phrases, nonetheless, this buoyantly humorous comedy provides lip-smacking leisure that can shock many with its skewering of either side. Not to say the information media that devours the Red vs. Blue conflict with an insatiable urge for food.


Richard Roeper, of the Chicago Sun-Times, praised each Stewart’s screenplay and the forged, notably Carell’s “finely honed” political strategist.

This is a comparatively light indictment of the cynical, money-driven political system, bolstered by profitable performances from the ensemble forged. The insightful screenplay by Stewart takes Hollywood’s tendency to condescend to small-town America and turns it the wrong way up in intelligent style..

The So-So

In his two-and-a-half star overview, The Boston Globe’s Ty Burr referred to as the film “well-played and well-intended,” however mentioned that the teachings the movie tries to impart are previous information at this level.

“Irresistible” is a film of the second. Unfortunately, that second is 2015. Amusingly snarky on its floor, angrily involved beneath, and surprisingly comfortable on the backside, this small-town political satire from writer-director Jon Stewart works arduous to be a Frank Capra film for the 21st century — only one that bites a little bit more durable.

Stephanie Zacharek, of Time, referred to as the movie “perfectly entertaining,” however famous that like different political satires, it tends to inform audiences issues they already know. 

Even essentially the most intelligent political satire can run aground, and Jon Stewart’s Irresistible is a working example. It’s completely entertaining as you’re watching, however when it’s over, you won’t really feel any smarter—or humbler—than you probably did entering into..

The Ugly

Entertainment Weekly critic Leah Greenblatt mentioned the movie’s leads had no chemistry, panned the supporting characters as “walking punchlines,” and mentioned Stewart had little or no new or attention-grabbing to say with the movie.

What Stewart, who penned the script in addition to directed, appears decided to point out — or relatively inform — his viewers is simply how far our collective values have strayed when grandstanding takes the place of motion, and armchair punditry turns into the enemy of all good religion. That message, alas, isn’t simply resistible; it’s previous information.


Katie Walsh, of the Chicago Tribune, criticized Stewart for ladening his gifted forged with “a bewildering plot, tired tropes, and embarrassing dialogue.” 

With “Irresistible,” Stewart needs to have his blueberry streusel and eat it too, making an attempt to craft “biting” commentary with no tooth, that patronizes however refuses to offend, and stumbles over itself making an attempt to be each snarky and honest.


Alison Wilmore, of Vulture, joined the refrain of critics panning Stewart’s writing and directing, pitying viewers who need to “slog” by the “unfunny” movie.

Irresistible isn’t simply shockingly ineffectual in its insights into nationwide schisms — it’s, in an added betrayal, unfunny, requiring its viewers to slog their method by a lot laborious farce with no snigger in sight..