When France extorted Haiti – the greatest heist in history


In the wake of George Floyd’s killing, there have been requires defunding police departments and calls for for the removal of statues. The subject of reparations for slavery has additionally resurfaced.

Much of the reparations debate has revolved round whether or not the United States and the United Kingdom ought to lastly compensate a few of their residents for the financial and social prices of slavery that also linger right this moment.

But to me, there’s by no means been a extra clear-cut case for reparations than that of Haiti.

I’m a specialist on colonialism and slavery, and what France did to the Haitian folks after the Haitian Revolution is a very infamous examples of colonial theft. France instituted slavery on the island within the 17th century, however, within the late 18th century, the enslaved inhabitants rebelled and finally declared independence. Yet, in some way, within the 19th century, the considering went that the previous enslavers of the Haitian folks wanted to be compensated, reasonably than the opposite approach round.

Just because the legacy of slavery within the United States has created a gross economic disparity between Black and white Americans, the tax on its freedom that France pressured Haiti to pay – known as an “indemnity” on the time – severely broken the newly impartial nation’s capacity to prosper.

The value of independence

Haiti formally declared its independence from France in 1804. In October 1806, the nation was break up into two, with Alexandre Pétion ruling within the south and Henry Christophe ruling within the north.

Despite the truth that each of Haiti’s rulers have been veterans of the Haitian Revolution, the French had by no means fairly given up on reconquering their former colony.

In 1814 King Louis XVIII, who had helped overthrow Napoléon earlier that 12 months, despatched three commissioners to Haiti to evaluate the willingness of the nation’s rulers to give up. Christophe, having made himself a king in 1811, remained obstinate within the face of France’s exposed plan to bring back slavery. Threatening warfare, essentially the most distinguished member of Christophe’s cupboard, Baron de Vastey, insisted,“ Our independence will be guaranteed by the tips of our bayonets!”

A portrait of Alexandre Pétion.
Alfred Nemours Archive of Haitian History, University of Puerto Rico

In distinction, Pétion, the ruler of the south, was prepared to barter, hoping that the nation may be capable of pay France for recognition of its independence.

In 1803, Napoléon had offered Louisiana to the United States for 15 million francs. Using this quantity as his compass, Pétion proposed paying the identical quantity. Unwilling to compromise with these he considered as “runaway slaves,” Louis XVIII rejected the supply.

Pétion died instantly in 1818, however Jean-Pierre Boyer, his successor, saved up the negotiations. Talks, nevertheless, continued to stall because of Christophe’s cussed opposition.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for newsletter.]

“Any indemnification of the ex-colonists,” Christophe’s authorities said, was “inadmissible.”

Once Christophe died in October 1820, Boyer was in a position to reunify the 2 sides of the nation. However, even with the impediment of Christophe gone, Boyer repeatedly didn’t efficiently negotiate France’s recognition of independence. Determined to realize not less than suzerainty over the island – which might have made Haiti a protectorate of France – Louis XVIII’s successor, Charles X, rebuked the 2 commissioners Boyer despatched to Paris in 1824 to attempt to negotiate an indemnity in exchange for recognition.

On April 17, 1825, the French king instantly modified his thoughts. He issued a decree stating France would acknowledge Haitian independence however solely on the worth of 150 million francs – or 10 instances the quantity the U.S. had paid for the Louisiana territory. The sum was meant to compensate the French colonists for his or her misplaced revenues from slavery.

Baron de Mackau, whom Charles X despatched to ship the ordinance, arrived in Haiti in July, accompanied by a squadron of 14 brigs of war carrying greater than 500 cannons.

Rejection of the ordinance virtually definitely meant warfare. This was not diplomacy. It was extortion.

With the specter of violence looming, on July 11, 1825, Boyer signed the fatal document, which said, “The present inhabitants of the French part of St. Domingue shall pay … in five equal installments … the sum of 150,000,000 francs, destined to indemnify the former colonists.”

French prosperity constructed on Haitian poverty

Newspaper articles from the period reveal that the French king knew the Haitian authorities was hardly able to making these funds, as the full was greater than 10 instances Haiti’s annual funds. The remainder of the world appeared to agree that the quantity was absurd. One British journalist famous that the “enormous price” constituted a “sum which few states in Europe could bear to sacrifice.”

A facsimile of the financial institution word for the 30 million francs that Haiti borrowed from a French financial institution.
Lepelletier de Saint-Remy, ‘Étude Et Solution Nouvelle de la Question Haïtienne.’

Forced to borrow 30 million francs from French banks to make the primary two funds, it was hardly a shock to anybody when Haiti defaulted quickly thereafter. Still, the new French king despatched one other expedition in 1838 with 12 warships to power the Haitian president’s hand. The 1838 revision, inaccurately labeled “Traité d’Amitié” – or “Treaty of Friendship” – reduced the outstanding amount owed to 60 million francs, however the Haitian authorities was as soon as once more ordered to take out crushing loans to pay the steadiness.

Although the colonists claimed that the indemnity would solely cover one-twelfth the value of their misplaced properties, together with the folks they claimed as their slaves, the full quantity of 90 million francs was truly 5 instances France’s annual budget.

The Haitian folks suffered the brunt of the implications of France’s theft. Boyer levied draconian taxes as a way to pay again the loans. And whereas Christophe had been busy creating a national school system throughout his reign, underneath Boyer, and all subsequent presidents, such tasks needed to be placed on maintain. Moreover, researchers have found that the independence debt and the ensuing drain on the Haitian treasury have been straight accountable not just for the underfunding of schooling in 20th-century Haiti, but additionally lack of well being care and the nation’s incapacity to develop public infrastructure.

Contemporary assessments, moreover, reveal that with the curiosity from all of the loans, which weren’t utterly paid off till 1947, Haitians ended up paying greater than twice the worth of the colonists’ claims. Recognizing the gravity of this scandal, French economist Thomas Piketty acknowledged that France should repay not less than US$28 billion to Haiti in restitution.

A debt that’s each ethical and materials

Former French presidents, from Jacques Chirac, to Nicolas Sarkozy, to François Hollande, have a historical past of punishing, skirting or downplaying Haitian calls for for recompense.

In May 2015, when French President François Hollande grew to become solely France’s second head of state to go to Haiti, he admitted that his nation wanted to “settle the debt.” Later, realizing he had unwittingly supplied gasoline for the authorized claims already ready by legal professional Ira Kurzban on behalf of the Haitian folks – former Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide had demanded formal recompense in 2002 – Hollande clarified that he meant France’s debt was merely “moral.”

To deny that the implications of slavery have been additionally materials is to disclaim French historical past itself. France belatedly abolished slavery in 1848 in its remaining colonies of Martinique, Guadeloupe, Réunion and French Guyana, that are nonetheless territories of France right this moment. Afterwards, the French authorities demonstrated as soon as once more its understanding of slavery’s relationship to economics when it took it upon itself to financially compensate the former “owners” of enslaved folks.

The ensuing racial wealth gap is not any metaphor. In metropolitan France 14.1% of the population lives beneath the poverty line. In Martinique and Guadeloupe, in distinction, the place greater than 80% of the inhabitants is of African descent, the poverty rates are 46% and 40%, respectively. The poverty rate in Haiti is much more dire at 59%. And whereas the median annual revenue of a French household is $31,112, it’s solely $450 for a Haitian household.

These discrepancies are the concrete consequence of stolen labor from generations of Africans and their descendants. And as a result of the indemnity Haiti paid to France is the primary and solely time a previously enslaved folks have been pressured to compensate those that had as soon as enslaved them, Haiti must be on the heart of the worldwide motion for reparations.